Archive for the ‘Google’ Category

Google’s NCAA Tournament Picks: Users over SEO

Tuesday, March 26th, 2013 by Greg Moore

If your company does big business selling automotive brackets, you might not be too happy with Google right now.  On the other hand, if you’re one of the millions of people who spent hours (or minutes) filling out NCAA Men’s Basketball Tournament brackets, you may appreciate the internet giant’s most recent addition to blended search results.

Thanks to Google’s “answer cards,” sports fans have been able to quickly search for the score of the latest Patriots game or look up the Red Sox schedule for the coming week, with the results nested neatly at the top of the SERP.  The search engine’s newest foray into this arena has embedded a fully interactive NCAA bracket into the top of the search results.  All it takes is a quick search for “ncaa bracket“, “march madness“, “ncaa results“, “bracket” or any related query and users can completely bypass sports websites like ESPN, SB Nation or CBSSports.com, getting the information they’re looking for in approximately 0.17 seconds.

This interactive bracket is front and center in Google's search results. Organic listings appear beneath it.

Now those sports sites are likely still getting plenty of traffic from fans looking for a specific brand of coverage or some deeper analysis, but your co-worker who filled out her bracket based on teams with nice looking uniforms  may not know where to go to find tournament results.  So it’s off to Google, where the sites with the best SEO strategy are the first to be seen and most likely to be clicked on – or at least they would have been in 2012.  Have you seen the size of this bracket?  This weekend’s Sweet Sixteen round only features 8 games and still takes up everything above the fold.  Navigate back to the first round and you’ll see all 32 games stacked vertically, taking up more real estate than the natural listings, now buried in endless scrolling.  All the SEO in the world won’t get a casual basketball fan to scroll past that.

With a fully expanded bracket, organic listings only appear in the bottom 33% of the SERP.

This is clearly the most extreme example of Google supplanting other websites with its own search answers, but it does represent a potential trend that marketers and content writers need to take into account.  Searches for weather, sports scores and schedules, traffic and much more yield similar results and are reminiscent of various “cards” within Google’s highly successful mobile search assistant – Google Now.  With various rumors surfacing in recent months about the possible development of a Chrome/desktop version of the app, the idea of a super customized search experience where Google actually delivers content on top of search results means that for certain industries, a #1 ranking might not mean as much as once did.

Instead, it might take more focused content to break through.  If you’re the sports website, don’t just provide NCAA Tournament results, provide analysis, predictions and content that users can’t get anywhere else.  Find a way to get through the clutter with specific content that people will seek out.  Google has consistently preached that exceptional user experience and exceptional content are what it is looking for, and this move could help push some websites closer to that ideal.

Impact of Recent Changes to Google Grants Program

Friday, March 8th, 2013 by Shane Kelly

Earlier this year, Google made substantial changes to the Google Grants programGoogle Grants is essentially a “free” version of AdWords offered to select non-profit organizations with 501(c)(3) status.

In late January, Google enacted a change that allowed Google Grant campaign managers to bid up to $2 for the maximum cost-per-click bid, doubling the previous $1 bid limit. With this increase, there was also a new limitation enacted which would push all Google Grant ads below paid advertisements for all queries.

When the change was announced, it was unclear if the increased cost-per-click bid limit would offset the new requirement for Grant ads to appear below all paid AdWords ads. Would the net effect lead to more or less traffic for Google Grants campaigns? We decided to find out by running a test in which no other changes were made to the account during this period; the only change was increasing all keyword bids to the new $2.00 threshold.

After running a Grant campaign for one month after increasing the bids to $2, the results are in. We can say without a doubt that the changes to the program lead to much higher traffic levels!

Now this could certainly differ by keyword category, or based on the keyword types driving traffic to a Grants program. Campaigns using a lot of long-tail terms with little or no advertiser competition might see more of a net gain than an account that was using competitive terms that were still attainable with a $1 bid. Another factor that could lead to more traffic would be the ability to serve ads against previously unattainable keywords that required more than a $1 CPC bid in order to be eligible for the auction.

In our experience, we noticed a small drop in average position and click-through-rate which makes sense, as ads from paid accounts would be placed on top of ads from Google Grant campaigns by default. Click-through-rate is highly correlated with Average position, as ads with higher positions tend to get more clicks with all other factors remaining equal.

Google Grants Average Position

Average Position

Google Grants CTR % Before & After

CTR %

That being said, the positives outweighed the negatives by a landslide in our case!

With the ability to double bids up to $2 maximum cost-per-click, the Google Grant campaign noticed a massive spike in impressions, clicks, and “costs” (“costs” staying in quotes, as Google Grant campaigns do not have actual costs, but for our purposes this would be the value of the program traffic).

Google Grants Impressions Before & After

A 675% Increase in Impressions.

Google Grants Clicks Before & After

A 440% Increase in Clicks

Google Grants "Costs" Before & After

An 1154% Increase in “Costs”

So the jury is no longer out on this one- the changes Google made to the Grants program has had an extremely positive impact on this program! In fact, this is the closest this account has ever come to hitting the $10,000 monthly cap.

Google Images: A Redesigned Search Experience

Thursday, February 14th, 2013 by Seth Richtsmeier

If you searched for an image on Google the last couple weeks, you may have noticed some changes. In late January last month, Google launched their redesigned images tool aiming to provide a better search experience, as announced on the Webmaster Central Blog. So what does this mean? What’s new?

  1. Image results are displayed in an inline panel.
  2. The source page no longer loads in an iframe.
  3. Info about an image, meta data, is displayed underneath the image instead of redirecting the searcher to a separate landing page.
  4. There are four clickable targets featured next to the image instead of two.

What are the benefits of the change?

Redesign upsides and downsides

The upsides largely outweigh the downsides with the new design, but webmasters are expressing their concerns over lower traffic levels, as well as the option for the searcher to obtain the high-resolution image without being directed to the hosting site. On WebmasterWorld, a webmaster had this to say:

“There is minimal traffic from image search on 4 websites i am tracking. The traffic remained is the actual search traffic, nothing from images.

When people get the full resolution image, they have no reason to click to go to the URL.”

Many webmasters commenting on the Webmaster Central Blog are saying similar things, and it will be interesting to see if Google implements another change to rectify the issue. But if your site doesn’t rely on traffic from images, the redesign will likely only improve your metrics.