Posts Tagged ‘Facebook Places’

How the New Facebook Privacy and Tagging Settings Will Impact Brand Pages

Tuesday, August 30th, 2011 by admin

Last week, Facebook announced several new privacy and tagging changes that they were in the process of implementing.  These changes would help to answer the question that many users are consistently asking about their published content: “Who can see this?”  By incorporating inline setting controls throughout a user’s wall and info tab, a user can address this concern now with ease.

A small icon depicting the image of two heads now appears adjoined with the content displayed throughout your profile.  This icon represents a drop-down menu that allows a user to change the privacy settings for that particular piece of content.  From your favorite band listed within your info tab to your most recent mobile upload, this inline feature controls what shows up on your profile.

Inline controls for Facebook Privacy Settings

This drop-down menu currently lists four options: Public, Friends, Only Me and Custom.  With this update, the privacy setting categorization of “Everyone” has been changed to “Public.” Public indicates that anyone may see this content, but it will not be showed to literally everyone.  With time, the Friends Lists and Groups you currently belong to will additionally be options in this drop-down menu.  Similar to the way in which Google+ allows you to share with “circles,” Facebook plans to allow the user to easily select the exact audience the post is intended for.

Previously, when a friend tagged you in a photo it would immediately be featured in your profile.  With the recent tagging modification, you can choose to approve or reject photo tags before they are displayed.  The photos that have not been approved will be hidden in a “Pending Posts” tab to preview.  For Pages, this feature is significant because Admins can filter unwanted posts or spam from appearing on their wall.  Beyond rejecting a photo tag, the Admin can now also choose to request the photo be taken down or block the user who tagged them in the inappropriate photo.

Approving hidden posts on Facebook of tagged pictures

The aspect of these privacy changes that impacts Facebook Pages the most is that formerly you could only tag someone if you were friends with them, and you could only tag a Page if you had liked it.  Your company can now be tagged by anyone who wants to mention you but hasn’t taken the time to search for and “Like” the official page.  Additionally, when non-friends tags a page it will only appear if the post is approved – allowing for another level of filtering.

There have also been changes made to Facebook “Places.”  Places will now be referred to as “Locations.” Instead of “checking –in,” locations (business locations!) can be added to any posts from both a smartphone and a desktop computer.

Adding a place or location or business to Facebook

In conclusion, the latest setting updates will impact your brand’s Page because “fans” can now tag a business in status updates without officially “liking” it by either tagging the location or tagging the page.  Potential new customers are able to interact with a brand with ease, and more importantly it is easier for brands to respond to fans outside of just those who like your page or own a smartphone.

[Image Source: The Facebook Blog]

Related Posts:

How to keep Your Company’s Social Media Accounts from being Compromised
How to Disable Facebook Facial Recognition
How To Clean Up Your Facebook Profile

Will Americans Be More Likely to Share Location With Facebook Places?

Thursday, September 2nd, 2010 by Joe Webster

Two weeks ago Facebook announced a new feature called Places. If you’re one of the social networks 500 million users, you’ve likely heard about it. If you’re not, you’ve still likely heard about it. Facebook Places, like Foursquare, Loopt, and Gowalla, offers a service that allow users to “check in” to venues (businesses, restaurants, events, etc.) and share their physical location with friends. While Facebook essentially offers the same functionality as sites like Foursquare and Gowalla, it differs from its competitors in one huge way (literally). As previously alluded to, Facebook is 500 million users deep and Places not only intends to tap into this preexisting subscriber base, but also hopes to bring location-based services to the masses.

However, Places has its work cut out for it. Despite the increasing popularity and rapid growth of location-centric social networking platforms, Americans have been slow to adopt such services. According to Forrester Research, a minuscule 4 percent of Americans have tried location-based services and only 1 percent of users use them weekly. This means that of 310 million Americans, approximately 12.4 million have interacted with or used location-based services. So what’s stopping everyone else?

A recent poll conducted by Lifehacker potentially sheds some light on the forces at play. After posing the question: “Do you share your location?” 4,360 readers revealed the likelihood of sharing their physical whereabouts with others.

While more than one-third of participants admit to, at least occasionally, sharing their location, the majority of respondents preferred avoiding location services altogether. It’s clear that a lack of incentives and a concern for privacy are two significant obstacles in the path of mainstream US adoption. Approximately one-fifth of the voters saw little reason to share their location, while the remaining 53.99 percent chose not to share their location for the sake of maintaining their privacy.

More than half of the participants polled raise a valid concern: How can one maintain their privacy while simultaneously broadcasting their physical location on a regular basis? Privacy becomes a major issue when users fear their every move is being observed. If not used carefully, a user’s safety could potentially be at risk. This scares people and Places will have to address these very real concerns.

If anyone can bring location to the masses, it’s Places. But before Facebook’s grand ambitions can become a reality, it must first clearly demonstrate value to the average American and assure its users a sufficient level of privacy. Until then, location will be ruled by the few.